Literary Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Literary Analysis - Essay Example In a similar manner, the resilient attitude of Martin Luther King was able to fortify the position of the African Americans until they were able to claim complete civil liberties. The adoption of non-violent norms meant that Gandhi and King both relied on their words to convince people to action. This stood in contrast to the use of violence by the forces opposed to both Gandhi and King. Effective communication was able to afford both Gandhi and King large audiences that later allowed them to change the fate of their nations. Words publicly spoken by Gandhi and King became their strongest tools for change. If the speeches made by Gandhi and King are looked into detail, it becomes clear that both use some common techniques such as repetition, the use of metaphors, advocating non violence and creating a strong sense of moral authority. However, there are certain rhetorical elements that are unique to Gandhi and King’s manner of speaking. This paper will look into various rhetori cal techniques used by Gandhi and King to induce a sense of moral authority and why this development is important. In order to carry out this analysis, this paper will focus on â€Å"Gandhi Defends His Beliefs† and â€Å"Martin Luther Addresses the Diet of Worms†. ... In the start, Gandhi looked for greater political autonomy to provide greater freedoms in the current system of governance. However, the actions of the British and their intolerant political attitude soon convinced Gandhi that the current system was nothing more than eyewash. Gandhi took up arms in the form of his words to claim complete freedom from the British Empire. In his speech, Gandhi expresses his rage at the current system of governance by saying (Safire 363): â€Å"I have no desire whatsoever to conceal from this court the fact that to preach disaffection toward the existing system of government has become almost a passion with me.† Gandhi’s words clearly indicate that he is not fond of the government’s actions. However, Gandhi coats his words to create a moral authority which stands against the government but is still justified. In choosing his words, Gandhi ensures that his words do not hint at violence of any kind. He specifically chooses the word â €Å"disaffection† to express his reaction towards the government. This choice of words ensures that the recipient audience are not pushed towards violence while they develop a certain distance from the government. Gandhi also uses the word â€Å"passion† in order to express his fondness of hating the current system of governance. Although, it can be seen as an exaggeration but it cannot be denied that this combination of words has a significant effect. To provide his words with greater moral strength, Gandhi tends to repeat his idea of non-violence in his speech. Gandhi expressed this in the following words (Safire 364): â€Å"I wanted to avoid violence, I want to avoid violence – Nonviolence is the first article of my faith – It is also the last article of my creed